F

CAPSTONE HEALTHCARE OF DAINGERFIELD

507 E W M WATSON BLVD, DAINGERFIELD, TX 75638
Score: 7 / 100

Capstone Healthcare Of Daingerfield has received an F grade based on CMS data, with a score of 7/100 — placing it among the lowest-rated nursing facilities in Texas. Families considering this Daingerfield facility should carefully review its inspection history and quality metrics.

Capstone Healthcare Of Daingerfield provides above-average staffing with 4.79 total nurse hours per resident per day. Higher staffing levels are generally associated with better care outcomes and more attentive staff.

Recent CMS inspections identified 57 deficiencies at Capstone Healthcare Of Daingerfield, including 5 classified as serious — among the most concerning citation levels. The most notable finding involved: post nurse staffing information every day..

Score Breakdown

Overall CMS Rating 8 / 40 pts
1 ★ CMS rating
Health Inspections 5 / 25 pts
1 ★ inspection rating
Staffing 16 / 20 pts
4 ★ staffing rating
Quality Measures 3 / 15 pts
1 ★ quality measures

🏥 Staffing Details

Staff Type Hours/Resident/Day National Avg Comparison
Total Nursing 4.79 3.8 Above Average
Registered Nurses (RN) 0.27 0.7 Below Average
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) 0.96 0.7 Above Average
Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) 3.56 2.4 Above Average
Weekend Total Nursing 4.00 3.8 Average
Weekend RN Hours 0.17 0.7 Below Average

🔍 Inspection & Deficiency History

57
Total Deficiencies
Apr 23, 2025
Most Recent Inspection
🟠 52 Moderate 🔴 5 Serious
View recent deficiencies (5 shown)
  • Tag 0732 Severity F
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    Apr 23, 2025 · Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies
  • Tag 0838 Severity F
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day ope
    Apr 23, 2025 · Administration Deficiencies
  • Tag 0583 Severity E
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    Apr 23, 2025 · Resident Rights Deficiencies
  • Tag 0656 Severity E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    Apr 23, 2025 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies
  • Tag 0693 Severity E
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a f
    Apr 23, 2025 · Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies

📊 Resident Outcome Measures

Based on CMS quality measure data. Lower percentages are better for most metrics.

Measure This Facility Nat'l Avg
Residents with pressure ulcers 6.8% 4.5% Worse
Falls with major injury 4.3% 3.0% Worse
On antipsychotic medication 22.1% 14.5% Worse
Urinary tract infections 2.5% 2.5% Average
ADL decline (daily activities) 38.2% 14.0% Worse
Excessive weight loss 2.3% 7.5% Better
New/worsened incontinence 19.3% 45.0% Better

⚠️ Penalties & Fines

5 penalties recorded by CMS

Total fines: $301,425

How This Grade Was Calculated

This facility's grade of F is based on a score of 7 out of 100, calculated from official CMS Nursing Home Compare data:

  • Overall CMS Rating: 1★ → 8 pts (max 40)
  • Health Inspection Rating: 1★ → 5 pts (max 25)
  • Staffing Rating: 4★ → 16 pts (max 20)
  • Quality Measures Rating: 1★ → 3 pts (max 15)
  • Penalty deductions: -15 pts
  • Fine deductions: -10 pts

Grades: A=85+, B=70–84, C=55–69, D=40–54, F=below 40

Facility Details

Ownership
For profit - Corporation
Certified Beds
106
Provider Type
Medicare and Medicaid
Resident Council
Yes
Family Council
No
Sprinkler System
Yes
Last Inspection
Apr 23, 2025
Deficiencies (Cycle 1)
24